![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Article 6:
The Difference between the We distinguish those sacred books from the apocryphal, namely: the third book of Esdras, the books of Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Jesus Syrach, Baruch, the appendix to the book of Esther, the Song of the three Children in the Furnace, the history of Susannah, of Bell and the Dragon, the prayer of Manasses, and the two books of the Maccabees. All of which the Church may read and take instruction from, so far as they agree with the canonical books; but they are far from having such power and efficacy, as that we may from their testimony confirm any point of faith, or of the Christian religion; much less detract from the authority of the other sacred books. |
Articles
|
||||||||||
|
Historical Notes (web editor)
The Apocryphal Books historically were never considered part of the text of Scripture. They are additions to the Old Testament, but they are not part of the text of the Hebrew Bible (or Tanach as it is called in Judaism). The church father Jerome in translating the Bible into Latin, the Vulgate, wanted to exclude them because of this fact. Their popularity as devotional literature compelled him to include them. The church of Rome at the time of the Reformation was divided over their validity as Scripture in its Council of Trent 1545-1563. The church of Rome officially elevated them to the level of Scripture at the Vatican council of 1870. In so doing, Rome broke with the ancient church, the historical canon of Scripture, and has corrupted the Bible as the Word of God. Such action by Rome also gives the lie to its false claim to be apostolic. Some Eastern sects have additional apocryphal books. Scriptural Proof: No text referenced |
|||||||||||